-
Tackling discrimination in academic publishing
The process of peer-review, underpinned by the integrity (and in most cases volunteerism) of expert reviewers and editorial boards, is a key mechanism for maintaining standards in academic publishing and the validity of research outputs. Of course, there is an inevitable degree of subjectivity and error in peer review, but as academics it is a process that we necessarily submit ourselves to in the expectation that it will be an equitable and transparent process, and that our work will be judged fairly on its merit.
Read more -
SPARC Europe’s Latest Report: Insights into developments in Europe Open Education institutional policymaking
SPARC Europe’s new Open Education report “Insights into developments in Europe Open Education institutional policymaking”
Read more -
Individual relationships are key elements of equitable institutional partnerships
The case for working in partnership is probably so familiar that it need hardly be restated.
Read more
Resources
This introductory session took place on Thu 6 July 2023. It was designed for newcomers to the Knowledge Equity Network (KEN), introducing KEN and giving an overview of the key concepts contained within the Declaration on Knowledge Equity. The PowerPoint presentation for The Case for Knowledge Equity can be downloaded by selecting the link below. […]
Show your support for KEN as a Signatory of the Declaration on Knowledge Equity by adding our signature badge to your emails. Click the image below to download this asset and link it to our website. Please use the hyperlink option when setting up your signature to link the ‘Find out more’ button to the […]
What makes the Knowledge Equity Network different to other networks and declarations?